Obviously never in modern times however again its not every MP or PM
I am not a lawyer and this isnt a court, however you did say the implication is clear about Heath
No, the implication was that he had police officers assigned to him 24/7 until he died! Hence, why I said they would know when he farted.It would not take much investigating of the allegations to pin him to down to particular whereabouts of interest.
Evidently not that obvious and clearly not every MP PM, Lord or Peer etc, likes to rape children.
OK
Well it wasn't OK. And you could be thrown in prison. But it was thought to be only a minority who did that sort of thing- and maybe it was?
And yes you could be thrown into prison for being homosexual. Just shows that times have changes, and I guess from your post you are quite young?
Still is the minority, its what people do with information, once they know of unsavoury activities!
I don't see my age as relevent, if this turns out to be a gay man seeking physical consenting contact of another adult Human and because of his position and the age he was in, felt it necessary to seek it paid, then that is very sad for him and reflects badly on our nation!
The line it was a different time and that in some way more acceptable is nonsense and attempts to try and sanitise!Thus far we have some beta slaves of Heaths, stand by his legacy, while current alpha's are where on this?
Beta slaves , alphas ?
Betas, his staff and those assigned to him, thus far have been the most vocal in a dead mans defence.Alphas, his successors and those controlling persons assigned to him.
Slaves is a bit of an emotive term
Of course your age is central to your position and reasoning in the discussion.
You should be aware it was never acceptable. It was seen as totally abnormal behaviour -as was being gay in the 1940/1950s.