|
Yeah that's worked out really well hasn't it, no complaints at all from the people who didn't get the answer that they were hoping for.
While a 2nd go at getting the result you wanted may sound enticing to you, consider some of the complications:
What if the stupid scared UKIP types don't understand the question and think wrong again?
What if our thickies understand the Yes/No question well enough, but then the thickies in Italy or Hungary don't understand the question in their referendum on the deal we're offered (you threw that cat amongst the pigeons) and they vote against it?
Either scenario would result in 2 years of wasted negotiations and a superdupertitaniumWTO Brexit.
On that basis, how many referendums do you think will be taking place due to a bad deal (from anyone's perspective) being offered to the UK?
What you have to embrace Tap, because it increasingly seems you understand very little about what is actually going on at the moment, is that the default position is that we leave the EU and trade with them on WTO terms.
Neither party in this negotiation want that to happen, there's far too much money at stake.
This means that the text contained within Article50 is almost irrrelevant in comparison to the real world consequences of Brexit.
You're either being blinded by your own bias, or you just don't understand politics. |
|