Labours ongoing anti semitism row

robel

You have to ask yourself why is Corbyn and those like him, so obsessed with the worlds only Jewish country, a country smaller than Wales. It cant be that he is pro peace nor do i think he is pro Palestinian. Which leaves only one option.

Bl4ckGryph0n

What reasons to you have to disbelieve those, well let’s face it me as nobody else has come forward, to openly say I’m lying?

How else can it be discussed if you haven’t read it? You may have that approach, i most definitely don’t. It was the first thing I did when I learned that Labour wasn’t adopting it verbatim, i did some research to see why not and what they are changing.

springtide

OK I apologise, you have read it, but you choose not to comment on the differences. I'm no longer interested in all honesty as if there was something shocking, it would have been already highlighted. As I said, storm in a teacup.

springtide

I think like a few others (such as the UN), he is not happy what is happening in the region.  
e.g.  the illegal settlements...  Briefing Security Council on Resolution 2334 (2016), Special Coordinator Urges Reversing Negative Trends in Palestinian-Israeli Conflict | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases

robel

As you said “you think” however i dont agree with that assertion and stand by my post. Furthermore the UN, its recommendations and its obsession can go fudge itself

Bl4ckGryph0n

Labour removed some of the contemporary working examples of anti semitism compared to the IHRA definition. Iirc whilst on my phone, togive one example of such removals they removed that comparing Israel to the Nazis is anti semitic. And there are three others.

Only labour will know the exact reason why they would do that. I’m sure we have all opinions about that, and it’s clear that some on here are very sympathetic in being able to draw that comparison. Toko Black made that very clear earlier in the thread for example.

I’m not saying that a definition can’t be updated. Not at all, after all it is a working definition and it should change over time. But considering the sh*t labour finds itself in, they are not wise doing this by themselves. Especially not when it would fall foul of the CPS definition as well in this country. But logically more so because they need to rebuilt their trust and intentions before they can handle such a delicate issue in my opinion.

springtide

And that was exactly the response I expected.  What is your expectation of the map of the region in say 10 years time?

Bl4ckGryph0n

Really? You are doing a Corbyn now in my opinion. Really not helpful, you can’t have it both ways in my opinion.

robel

As I said before, you have to ask yourself why is Corbyn and those like him, so obsessed with the worlds only Jewish country, a country smaller than Wales. It cant be that he is pro peace nor do i think he is pro Palestinian. Which leaves only one option. Do you agree or disagree with my statement?

As for the UN, an organization so corrupt and obsessed with Israel that it doesn't discuss Hizballah’s illegal build-up of rockets in Lebanon, the money and weapons Iran provides to terrorists or how to defeat ISIS. Nor do they discuss how to hold Bashar al-Assad accountable for the slaughter of hundreds and thousands of civilians. No, instead they obsess and focus on criticizing Israel.

UN Human Rights Council: From its creation in June 2006 through June 2016, the UN Human Rights Council over one decade adopted 135 resolutions criticizing countries; 68 out of those 135 resolutions have been against Israel (more than 50%). UN Nations General Assembly: From 2012 through 2015, the United Nations General Assembly has adopted 97 resolutions criticizing countries; 83 out of those 97 have been against Israel (86%). UNESCO: Each year, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) adopts around 10 resolutions a year criticizing only Israel. UNESCO does not criticize any other UN member state in a country-specific resolution (100%). An exception occurred in 2013, when, under pressure from UN Watch, UNESCO adopted one resolution on Syria.World Health Organization: For one week every year, the UN World Health Assembly, the decision-making body of the World Health Organization (WHO), meets to formulate global health policy. Resolutions are adopted to address global health issues. There is one exception: the annual resolution entitled “Health conditions in the occupied Palestinian territory, including east Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan,” which singles out Israel for condemnation; no other country in the world is condemned by the WHO.ILO: The International Labour Organization (ILO) was established to improve conditions of labor, regulate work hours, fight unemployment, assure adequate living wages, and protect workers worldwide. At its annual conference, however, the ILO produces a single country-specific report castigating Israel.So basically, Israel, the worlds only Jewish country is the most evil on the planet and by implication, the Jews.
It must be true that's why, England expelled them, France too, Spain chased them out once they ran out of fire wood to burn them with and Hitler gassed, experimented on and burnt, pretty much every Jew he could find from around the world....But its the Joooooz, the rest of the world are a peaceful, non racist, honest bunch.....

BobbyMac

It's like 10,000 spoons.............