|
I really don't see the need for this debate, but I figure there should be some correction made here.
"JD is not a bourbon" - well that depends how you want to look at it... they stopped marketing it as a bourbon and simply opted to call it an American Whiskey instead, it still ticks all the boxes of a bourbon and they are legally allowed to market it as such.
51% corn? Check.
Distilled spirit less than 80%? Check.
Aged in charred oak barrels? Check.
Aged below 62.5%? Check.
Bottled must be more than 40%? Check.
So really, you could argue that it's a bourbon... it ticks all the boxes that make it a bourbon, it's just not marketed by JD themselves as a bourbon.
So is it a bourbon? Yes.
Do they call it a bourbon? No.
Which is right? Well that depends who you ask, personally I would say it's a bourbon...
Of course there are plenty of people who will argue that there is no such thing as a Tennessee bourbon, but it's a Tennessee Whiskey.
It's all semantics though really. If you like bourbon you'll like Tennessee Whiskey, because they are made the same way, with the same things and ultimately don't taste too different. Of course there is the issue of quality etc, as with any alcohol.
Because of that, I think it's a pointless argument to have because both answers are easily justifiable as right... when really there is no definite right answer.
When is a bourbon not a bourbon? When it's a Tennessee Whiskey.
Can we get back on topic now, please? |
|