When I was public sector, the job I had plus the responsibility, and I do mean serious responsibility would have netted me a salary almost two thirds higher for a comparable job in the private sector, hence I took one.
So to complete the circle we're going round in, why would you (or anyone else) choose to work in the private sector when wages and pensions are better in the public sector?
My particular skills and experience mean that I could only be utilised by any public sector employer for a shorter period. After I'd completed what I'm good at, they'd have to find work for me which I would be over-qualified for.
And worth pointing out that in the past it was the case that the public sector got lower wages but better benefits. This was a reasonable trade-off.
The situation began to change under the previous labour government.
Do you actually dispute the figures? Are you saying that BBC fact check and others are wrong? On what basis?
The question should really be 'find a comparable job'. Many public sector jobs are simply not replicated in the private sector. That's why many who are made redundant from the public sector can struggle to find work in the private sector simply because their work was specialised.