|
Absolutely, and no one (despite the best efforts of the liberals to misrepresent as "bigotry") is saying that we should never take in any refugees, ever.
My point is that at this current time, when we do have such a problem with "home grown" Islamist (I didn't say Muslim, before anyone has a fit of the vapours) terrorists, is it sensible to take in a lot of fighting age young men from war zones in the middle east, where they may well have been exposed to the Islamist (not Muslim) ideology of ISIS etc?
To claim that "only" 20% of terror attacks in the UK are carried out by refugees, so that's alright then, seems to be astonishingly irresponsible, IMHO. It's a bit like saying "well, we've already got so many home grown terrorists, it won't hurt to let in a few more".
It is not bigotry, not racism, not xenophobia, not any other words on the virtue-signaller's bingo card, to say hang on, lets just put our safety first here and not allow people in who have the potential to cause us harm in the current political climate.
If that places me beyond the pale of the liberal mindset, then so be it. It would just be welcome to hear a coherent argument of their position for a change , rather than the default lazy reaching for "you are just a blah blah blah ist". |
|