|
I thought this implosion was down to Jeremy Corbyn's incompetence, lack of leadership and general dithering and not wanting to take responsibility.
But looking at the sequence of events leading up to Naz Shahs suspension, it looks like he was actually moderately supportive of Naz Shahs ignorant and offensive comments.
Initially, Corbyn's spokesman said he wasn't suggesting she was anti-Semitic!
Naz Shah said she made remarks she doesn't agree with. ?? Yes, she doesn't agree with herself.
Corbyn refused to do anything, so the question was asked if he had the authority to dismiss her. Answer of course, yes he is the leader!
But having met her for a cosy chat he has chosen not to.
After the apology in the house it "was mutually agreed that she is administratively suspended from the Labour Party by the general secretary". What the does that mean? She agreed as well?
Jeremy either ducked out of his leadership responsibilities because he is weak or he still thinks what she said was OK. He let an administrative body suspend her.
I wonder if he has called Ken (if they are still talking) and asked him to stop putting coals on the fire? |
|