|
No they don't. It might show that there's been an 18% reduction over 6 years and crime fell by 35%. What are the figures over 6 and half years? 7? 10? I'm saying people can fiddle the statistics anyway they please. Over the last 12 months it could be that crime had risen by 95%. The beauty of statistics.
I've already acknowledged that you can make cuts to the police and reduce crime. Of course you can. Being pedantic, you could cut a budget by 0.05% and it might have 0% impact. There has got to be a breaking point though - a sweet spot. Now that is rocket science, and personally I want a Govt that will err on the side of caution in finding that sweet spot rather than one that keeps cutting until people die and a generation of children are broken by austerity.
I'm saying that a prolonged programme of cuts across the board of any industry or business will eventually lead to a reduction of effectiveness. Whether that be more deaths in hospitals, longer waiting times in A&E, increase of crime, increased class sizes in schools, longer waiting on the phone to a call-centre - whatever. |
|