|
For reference No Deal has been taken off the table - for now - and we can't negotiate the WA any further. I'm sure that agreement also dies with May, so for now we have no WA. And are unlikely to negotiate one again. That ship has sailed. And sunk.
That leaves two choices (Go No Deal or revoke). However neither are going to win a majority in the HoC currently.
I also don't believe a GE win would currently give a majority to any party. So we'll still be where we are now, and as the next deadline looms are we going to require a further extension? Yes.
Just how long is it going to go beyond that, before everyone realises the only way a decision gets made is if the public are asked again. A simple two answer question, Do we remain, or do we leave without a deal? And of course this time it has to be written into law (however that's done), that parliament doesn't get to choose whether to enact the results, or even do any discussion around the result. Whoever is the PM at the time just enacts it.
(I've read it on here a few times about how parliament didn't have to enact the referendum result, it was just a manifesto pledge to do so. Well this time it needs to be more than that).
The problem is and will remain (pardon the pun), that really even with a majority and a party being whipped, I cannot ever see there ever being the numbers to agree to taking us out without a deal. Too many would rebel. And if we can't negotiate anything else, what do we do?
It's a question I've asked on here many times, and I always seem to get the same stupid answer - we had a vote, leave won. Yes it did. But how's that worked out so far?
Even though it feels like it, this cannot go on forever. A solution has to be reached, and I can't see any other solution other than another public vote. Whether people like it or not. |
|