|
I had a quick read through and I could still see no hard link between a hard border and the GFA. Instead their are emotional links, which I'm not saying are important, just that they don't have any formal standings.
So relating to the GFA seems almost like a veilled threat. People living near the border have become accustomed to being able to cross over the border whenever and wherever they want and have become somewhat content, despite the deep divisions that exist. If we replace this with a hard border then these people are going to become discontented and will start lobbing bombs around again.
And I'm not saying that this is not important, just that the link between the GFA and Hard Borders is about keeping the peace rather than any contractual agreements.
Cheers,
Nigel |
|