|
What other reason could there be for the sound? The sound is admissable as evidence along with hot spot, hot spot is showing nothing but there is a definate sound. The bat is miles from his pads, the only two things in any kind of vicinity of each other are bat and ball and there is a sound, surely that proves there must have been an extremely faint edge thats not been picked up on hot spot but has been on audio and therfore correct decisions has been made on the pitch.
What mixed messages? please tell me what they are? The only really controversial one in this match was Khawaja, no hot spot, clear air between bat and ball and the sound showed quite clearly to have occurred when the ball was not close to the bat, the third umpire got it completely wrong plain and simple, DRS showed him that, he made the wrong decision, thats human error, not DRS
Regardless though, if the DRS had not even been there the on field decision would have been out anyway so DRS has changed nothing in that instance, if the third official had made the correct decision he would not have been out, would we have been discussing how good DRS is because of that? I doubt it as only the mistakes seem to be being highlighted
DRS has been used very well and very successfully for a long time now, in this series it seems the officials are having trouble with it, thats down to the officials. Just because the decisions have been wrong in this series it doesn't outweigh the amount of times it has been used successfully by a long shot.
Anyone that watches enough cricket will have seen it work very well. |
|