Author: coolchrisyorks

Global warming

[Copy link]

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:22:43 Mobile | Show all posts
Shame you didn't investigate the survey you were so proud of!!

Sidicks
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:22:43 Mobile | Show all posts
"To argue with a man who has renounced his reason is like giving medicine to the dead."
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:22:43 Mobile | Show all posts
You promised not to bother this thread again.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:22:44 Mobile | Show all posts
.
Reply

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:22:44 Mobile | Show all posts
Ah ok, fair enough.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:22:44 Mobile | Show all posts
Notice it wasn't the Pew Center on Global Climate Change.

It was the Pew Research Centre for People and the Press.
These are independant entities.
Unless of course it's all one big conspiracy.

Again, I produced some data.
Where is yours ?

I want the names of international or national scientific organisations that are climate skeptics - I say NONE.
I want the percentages of scientists and the percentages of climate scientists that are climate skeptics - I say 16% and 3% respectively.

If you want to refute my figures, produce your own to show they are wrong.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:22:44 Mobile | Show all posts
'Climate denialists' is a much more reasonable term than 'climate skeptics' EG.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:22:44 Mobile | Show all posts
Independent entities?

The former is a 'charitable trust' of the latter!

How is that independent?!!

Your data is b*ll*cks!!


How many non-government funded scientists are in your list?

The only way to prove these types of figures are right or wrong is to survey the entire population.  As this isn't practical you need to find a representative sample.  

Given the agenda of the entity involved in the sample you quote it is unlikely to be representative!!


Sidicks
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 04:22:45 Mobile | Show all posts
I prefer 'climate realist'!

Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

26-11-2019 04:22:45 Mobile | Show all posts
The Earth clearly is a greenhouse, otherwise night time temperatures would drop to unsupportable levels every night.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部