|
This might be a last throw of the dice. Lose one referendum is bad, lose two in the bounce and it will be a long time till you could ever propose another.
Could the Scottish Parliament stop the UK from leaving the EU? - BBC News
She is seeking to make slow, steady progress. In particular, she is not anxious to drive forward to an instant referendum on independence.
Why not? Because she fears she might lose it. The big challenges she faced in September 2014 were: the economy, the currency and membership of the EU. The third factor has now altered somewhat, positing the prospect of indyref2.
However, items one and two remain. What would independence do to the economy? What currency would an independent Scotland use?
Further, still, it is possible that Brexit might encourage furious Scots - and many are decidedly angry - to move in greater numbers towards independence.
Equally, it might make some think that the constitutional world is already scary and uncertain enough without revisiting the prospect of independence at this stage.
Ms Sturgeon, as she has made amply plain, wants more evidence that the people of Scotland are ready this time round to back independence. So she wants time. She needs time.
Hence, partly, the search for alternatives. The search for any means by which Scotland can maintain EU links.
To be clear again, this is a genuine, governmental search. Ms Sturgeon is not bluffing or deploying guile. She, authentically, wants ideas as to how to proceed. |
|