|
The big problem here is that everyone is somewhat both right and wrong about tax avoidance being good/bad or neutral because everyone is using slightly different definitions or personal takes on what avoidance means and at the same time contrasting that with varying views on what is moral or not.
-> From avoidance being purely the practice of avoiding paying more than most people would agree that you should according to both the law and morality, all the way to the other end of the spectrum of avoidance being exactly the same as evasion in all but it's legal status.
There could be 4 different categories or variations of how we use and apply the word 'avoidance' to tax.
1) Ethical Tax Avoidance (avoidance(E)) - paying what you should and avoiding paying more than is fair according to not only the tax law, but also according to the spirit of that law.
Example: claiming back the VAT on the office furniture you bought and use only for work.
2) Unethical Tax Avoidance (avoidance(U)) - avoiding paying any more than is legal.
Example: claiming back the VAT on the office furniture you bought and mainly use for personal purposes - like the desk, chair you and your family use to play computer games on in your spare room, but claim it as 'business expenditure' because you 'claim' you do your accounting and business admin at it, and because you might do once or twice a year, you can legally justify it.
3) Amoral Tax Avoidance (avoidance(A)) - avoiding paying any more than is legal and disputing there is any real difference between Ethical and Unethical Tax Avoidance or morality simply doesn't come into it.
4) Moral Tax Avoidance (avoidance(M)) - avoiding paying any more tax than is legal is a moral imperative.
Personally, when I complain, argue or talk about tax avoidance, I am generally doing so as avoidance(U) i.e those people and organisations that utilise loop holes, unintentional flaws or limitations of the tax laws to pay as little as possible. Evasion in all but a legal technicalities.
There are however others on the forums and in the wider world that hold or take the position of avoidance(A) or even avoidance(M), so if we all just used the term tax avoidance, we would be going around in circles and on completely different pages unless we all knew precisely what each of us was personally meaning by 'tax avoidance' and where we stood.
On a final note, there are those who consider tax avoidance(U) to be bad, but scaled and for the most part, would not bother too much about Joe Smith the Plumber getting a new inkjet printer without paying VAT even though it's for his home use.
However, they would feel quite strongly about multi millionaires, billionaires and large corporations avoiding paying massive sums of money tax by legal but unethical means.
I personally fall into that category - I suggest it is wrong to fiddle the VAT on a plumbing job, but I'd tend to turn a blind eye to it .... but someone who earns £10 million a year doing the same is taking the pee. |
|