|
^^^ that's the one you jump on, after one or two violent alternatives
Wasn't being serious, though wouldn't mind him being forced to look after his various remarks on stoning homosexuals and adulterers according to Sharia law.
Tbh I don't think he will be found guilty, and struggle to understand exactly what he's being charged with and the precise details
- yes we all know the generalities, he is an Islamist extremist and revels in winding up the whole country, but from what I see of the exact details here ("Between 29 June 2014 and 6 March 2015 invited support for a proscribed terrorist organisation, namely ISIL, also known as ISIS or the Islamic State, contrary to section 12 Terrorism Act 2000") it's all rather wimpy and underwhelming and he'll wriggle out of it since I believe it hinges on the semantics of social media communications without actual explicit verbal support. |
|