|
You are right, it doesn't matter in most cases.
I simply answered a question that was asked - "why do you think the forum is 'Leave Heavy'?" with pretty reasonable observations and conclusions.
My issue is not so much in the disagreement with my conclusion - but in the unsupported accusation of having a cognitive reasoning error based on vacuous false equivalence and then followed up by derision and dismissal inplace of any reasonable explination, clarification or apology.
It is relevant in specific cases:
The only relevance is specific cases where comparisons are made to the electorate.
i.e When you extrapolate the results of polls or general consensus of opinion from this sub-forum on particular issues to make assertions or judgements about the country as a whole. If that issue or topic has has a significant bias from the electorates norm and you do not take into account that bias, you will end up with false answers.
A simple example of not taking into account a bias from the norm could be of being given a half full bottle of pop at the top of Ben Nevis, then walking down the mountain to Fort William and finding the bottle appears to not contain as much pop because it has started to squash inwards.
It could be easy to jump to the conclusion that bottle has leaked or someone has opened it, if you didn't take into account the difference in air pressure at ground level and at 4,413ft.
It may seem trivial and pedantic at a casual glance, but a false conclusion based on not taking account of a bias from the norm can lead to accusations, arguments and problems. |
|