Roflmao if that fits with their legal system then yes  I’ll concede on that point.
Does anyone know if Nigel Farage was associated with them?

No but Corbyn was allegedly 
Still waiting for the evidence of Russian meddling - after all if anyone wins a vote nowdays that the Guardian doesnt like its the result of Russian meddling..... 
Now the ball is in Belgium's court. (I am sure they are thrilled at that).
They have to decide whether Puigdemont acted in a way that Belgium sees as unlawful, before they can arrest him and send him back to Spain.
NOT a coup.
Its a disgusting and disturbing use of force by a supposed democratic nation against a small isolated group seeking their own democracy that they haven't been receiving or allowed to have.
Gibraltar decided to hold a referendum.
The Falklands decided to hold a referendum.
Neither were down to the UK government.
I'll bow to your greater legal / historical understanding, but were both illegal AND explicitly against the UK's wishes?
Why would there be a problem?
As many remainers point out on here. Even the official UK government sanctioned EU referendum is non-binding.
I agree, and most definitely did not warrant the disproportionate use of force and violence.