I watch plenty of the news bud, both sides, and there is still no evidence of chemical weapons used or by whom. Why not wait for the OPCW to do their job ?
War crimes ? Why does Bush and Blair come to mind.
Who supplied most of these chemical weapons in years gone by ?
Big up to you  I can think for myself and not sign on to be cannon fodder for another bankers war all in the name of humanitarian intervention. Plenty of war vets out there from Desert Storm etc full of regret.
How do they know its Assad though without inspectors going in and time and evidence to come to a conclusion. Again the government have seemingly jumped in and made a decision. Time and again we wait for an inquiry that lasts for years that just comes up with “lets not let it happen again”. But the last few weeks when we are dealing with (for want of better words) a super power we act impulsively.
On a home front the London stabbings don’t get the same decisive, immediate response of force(not air strikes obviously).
Plus the cost. No one seems to bat an eye lash to do some bombing but give more tax to the NHS.......
Good thing that there are people out there fighting for your right to 'think for yourself and not sign on'. Without them you wouldn't have that luxury 
I thought you were a Trump supporter Marv?
I appreciate what are military do, don't always agree so don't play that game 
They take orders like everyone else, it's what they signed up for. Told to act, not think. Compartmentalization at it's best.
Our luxury tho, comes at a lot of others expense, what we take for granted is only a dream for too many. Empathy is in short supply these days it seems 
Good speech by the Bolivian ambassador at the U.N.S.C. earlier.
Yes a fact that will missed by the ‘knee jerck’ reactionists, the years of efforts to block there use, the 12 or is it 13 times Russia has vetoed ANY intervention into the Syria conflict by the UN.
Their comes a point action must be taken to remind governments they cannot do as they please when it comes to killing their own people. It’s a shame it’s a tactic not used far more often around the world.
Ofcourse we all just act and don’t think. Have you got any idea how stupid you are sounding? You seriously haven’t got a clue have you.
Oh dear.
Naughty step?
I'am still pro Trump and Putin but i don't think attacking Syria without concrete proof is a good idea.
If there was concrete proof people would say it was doctored.