|
I have a digital photo frame plus I have a lot of my photos set as the screensaver slideshow on my laptop. It is nice to see memories, plus it helps me see some merit in my photos. What I mean by this is that when I first take and edit my photos I'm always disappointed, but then sometimes I'll look back at them a few months/years later and think that actually they're not that bad.
I also get frustrated as I see many great shots online and I have no idea how to achieve them, let alone then being able to go out and do it. I'm sure a lot of it has to do with lighting but some photos just have great rendering and clarity, and have that kind of 'publishable' quality about them. I wish I knew the secret I've no doubt some of it is photoshop skills as well.
And then there's the shots that I just don't see. For example I was looking at some photos of New York the other day and they were taken in such a way that they looked like a cracking portfolio of 'artwork' whereas you look at mine and they're just 'holiday snaps'. My photos are always 'picture postcard' or 'technically good' but generic and bland, I don't ever seem to see that 'artistic angle', something that takes it away from just another generic photo to something interesting, if that makes sense. And that tbh is my biggest frustration and a large part of why I periodically lose my mojo.
Take this for example, whilst it's 'just' a picture of the Guggenheim, but it's got some interest in the composition which makes it different to yet another generic photo of the Guggenheim. I wouldn't see this shot to then take it.
Outside Guggenheim |
|