|
I get that people expect video in cameras these days (it was Canon who popularised DSLR cinematography after all), but if video features are a deal breaker for someone, why are they looking at a stills camera?! I'd like to be able to move a sofa with a Ferrari, but it wouldn't put me off buying one.
3fps at full metering/focusing compares very poorly to other systems. As does the lack of IBIS (related to existing compatibility with IS equipped EF lenses?).
The price of those lenses! It's not far off normal L prices, but odd that for the consumer model they have chosen only one non-L lens. I would have expected a raft of "affordable" lenses to come with this model, and the L lenses to launch with the "pro" camera that's rumored to come later. Instead, half of the lenses they are launching cost more than the camera!! And 1 1/2 KG for the 28-70?! yikes!
Oddly, the Petapixel EOS R article has sample images, one of which has been taken with a lens that hasn't been launched (focal length given as 15mm). Mistake? Or do they have other info?
The lens control ring looks interesting, especially as the RF lenses being enormous will shift the balance of weight further onto your left hand. It's great they are offering an adapter that retro-fits this feature to old glass. The rear filter adapter is also a great use of the space. Shame it's one or the other (control ring, or filter - not both).
I remain skeptical of the touchy slidey button thing though. Will be keen to see how that's used, but my instinct is I would have preferred they kept the rear dial or added a joystick.
Overall, I think there's a chance they might have a well sorted camera in a couple of generations |
|