|
It's not fact to anyone. Almost all the sources you list below refer to assumption and conjecture.
SUGGESTS = conjecture.
is this relevant?
No we don't. We know it's less than $10m. The rest of the article is all about conjecture and assumption.
No we don't. We know that 0.91% of the people who completed the Steam survey that month were using a VR headset.
So you're taking all that conjecture and assumption, and drawing your own conclusions from it, based on your regularly demonstrated anti-Oculus agenda, and putting labels such as 'truth' and 'fact' on them?
I have nothing against conjecture. What I don't like is people trying to disguise conjecture as fact in an attempt to further personal agenda.
What you're posting here is not fact. It is not truth. It is conclusions you have drawn. It is conjecture. But you try to pretend it's fact. That's what I don't like.
Facebook do not 'keep Oculus afloat'. Facebook provide Oculus with a budget, and Oculus operate on that budget.
If Facebook did not provide that budget, Oculus would operate differently. |
|