|
Well, now that is stupid. What on earth are they thinking
Doing that would be a gateway to addiction, mine started with fags over a fiver bet that I couldn't smoke one without coughing in army cadets when I was 13.... I won the bet but it wasn't the best idea in the world.
My daughter is coming up to 12 this year, and to be honest I'd much prefer her to try these rather than smoking if she tries it at all. I'm not saying I condone her doing it, but if she does I'd prefer it to be with something that has approx 4000 less harmfall chemicals.
Obviously these were intended for people that already smoke, cannot quit, or have quit but came back to it due to X reason as a slightly healthier option like I have done.
'Regulating' is just their word for taxing as they are losing so much tax from the lack of tobacco products for those of us taking this route. I'm sure the tobacco company's are playing a part too as they are losing sales.
If it meant that they will regulate to make sure it's all safer and not add their tax on top fair enough, but since it's obvious that they will and allow people as young as 12 to do so legally, I'm totally against the idea.
tris |
|