|
Firstly, there is more heat. There's more CO2, so there must be more heat. Physics 101.
And, of course, you accept that by postulating mechanisms to get rid of it, which was my original question.
But you're not thinking it through. The effects you mention are certainly possible outcomes of increased temperature. But you forget that we're talking about dynamic stability here. For a start, your phrase "and more" does not make sense. If these effects generate a net cooling, then the mechanisms which drive them will stop (clouds will disappear, plants stop growing, etc) and warming will resume. The same applies even if there is a net warming. You are postulating mechanisms which exactly balance each other, thus keeping the temperature stable. But that implies that there is something magic about that temperature, when there clearly isn't. By adding heat to a system which is in thermodynamic stability you will increase its temperature to the point where the feedback mechanisms establish a new level. |
|