|
Well what a surprise, a climate change believer calling someone name for daring not to submit without questions to the new religion! It's common trend so I won't take it personally.
I don't need to do research to see that as long as the data fitted their argument, tree rings were fine to use. Now it doesn't, ah well just rubbish them.
However the link you sent, in trying to rubbish tree ring data as not reliable "anymore" is basically explaining how more CO2 makes plants more resistant to drought and grow better, right?
Yet the data since 1960 says that the tree rings are saying it's getting cooler (in other terms, the rings aren't as thick as before).
So basically there's more and more CO2 in the air but trees aren't growing well going against what your link says they should be doing.
Now if you want to tell me I misunderstood something feel free to do so but keep your name calling for the playground. |
|