|
So posters here knew there was no WMD, were satisfied that Saddam would not be building up his weapons - and were happy that he remained in power seriously oppressing his people with torture and all the rest and gassing towns if he felt they deserved to be punished. Everybody who says Blair lied were fooled by him?
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. As @fluxo said, many in the country felt the invasion was justified and we should join the Americans as they were our allies. The majority of MPs, on both sides of the house, also agreed. There was a lot of discussion in on TV and Newspapers, but the consensus was, on balance it was best to help the Iraqi people.
Of course there were some who were against like Robin Cook and Claire Short, although she was a bit slow with her resignation. And there were protests, mainly anti war, regardless of whether the reasons were sound or not. That is quite reasonable.
But if you were looking at the news today, its like Blair was the only person for the war and he fooled everybody. Just like the EU debate, some claims like Saddam could launch an attack within 45m, you knew were rubbish. Just like the Remain camp saying the Premier league would be doomed if we left.
The problem was not the deposing of Saddam, but rather the follow up plan. And the Americans were responsible for most of that.
Yes its terrible people died, but if we had won they wouldn't have died in vain. Iraq would be stable, we could say we did the right thing and this enquiry would not be happening. |
|