|
Not a particular fan of Kitson, but a comedian using satire and irony to juxtapose comfortable normalised ideas and memories with less savory and socially unacceptable behaviours in an effort to confront, challenge and make us think about ourselves while laughing is rather different from an MP or authority figure using inappropriate language or rhetoric for political purposes.
It's all context.
It is sometimes justifiable to use socially unacceptable language when it is the actual object of discussion for educational, academic or artistic purpose.
It is never justifiable when the use of socially unacceptable language is used as a pejorative without understood satire, even through ignorance, but especially when known to be by the user and/or audience.
It is ill advisable/risky to use socially unacceptable language as a pejorative when your audience doesn't necessarily understand or isn't clear that it's satire, but it's a grey area. |
|