|
Not sure of the rationale behind the enquiry, and I don't think it should be happening across the board (specific allegations against individuals I could understand and), but I do feel the army should be held to a higher standard.
If British troops in the Middle East decided to start beheading the enemy and streaming it live on the internet 'because IS are doing it', it doesn't mean it is justified (extreme example I appreciate).
Note that I was born in NI in the late 70's so experienced some of the troubles first hand. The terrorists on both sides were total scum to a man, and they should never have been let off, but I get the argument for the greater good (has anything other extended civil war been resolved any other way apart unless total destruction of one side was achieved?).
On the flip side, a lot of locals were aware of 'stories' about how the British forces obtained intel from enemy combatants and civilians. I have no delusions that most of it was nonsense, but even if some of it was true then there may be something to look at.
For reference I moved out of NI when I was 18 to get away from all that nonsense, by which I mean people in NI, so I am in no way anti-British forces or 'pro-NI', just offering a view. As I said earlier though, I don't think a blanket investigation is justified. |
|