|
You make a good point Cliff.
Another element to the discussions here have been tainted by groups of posters seemingly supporting each other's posts.
It occurred during the in out debate where heated arguments divided people.
The two camps then supporting each other's posts, and its continued ever since, spilling over here.
Not only has free speech been affected, but the inability to listen read and try and absorb what other people's arguments on a subject are, then consider them.
My out vote could have been swayed the other way had sufficient arguments been put forward.
That's doesn't work today.
Your either one group or the other, in whatever discussions.
I personally have tried to understand opposing views as the other posters have and would equally give way if suggestions were put forward to support points of view that could sway my thinking.
Unfortunately this doesn't happen, and isn't a two way process and invariably anger sets in and as shown in posts last night personal attacks wrapped up as 'not intended to offend', eventually are thrown into the discussion.
Yet, knowing it was inappropriate it wasn't acknowledge as such by the poster and removed after further discussions. To him it was acceptable behaviour.
It becomes one upmanship, winning points, proving that, 'I'm right, I win'
Everyone else is wrong.
My only comparison can be with the inability to acknowledge being wrong and the utterance of the word 'Sorry', today,which seem to have gone the same way as free speech. |
|