|
So how about a third referendum in 2022?
And a fourth in 2025?
That also acknowledges that people may have changed their minds.
So why are you ignoring that possibility?
For the last three years Parliamentary effort has gone in to making Brexit so painful that the electorate will accept it's too difficult. We went through a huge campaign of lies and deceit to try and persuade us to vote Remain. It didn't work and the majority still voted Leave.
Since then we have had an orchestrated and carefully planned campaign to make us change our mind. It has been orchestrated by our own parliament and the EU.
So what your second vote actually means is that Parliament has wilfully made it as painful as possible for us to leave. The intended purpose was to make us accept a partial Brexit or no Brexit at all. A second referendum is intended to do what the Remain campaign could not do and get us all to vote the correct way.
If the day after a general election the losing side says they don't accept the result and want another one, it doesn't get called "more democracy" it's called what it is - bad losers wanting a second bite of the cherry.
The telling fact of it not being "more" democracy is that there is only one group pushing for it, whereas generally speaking in most ballots, of any type, all sides are in favour of having a vote.
Why should those desiring Brexit need to win two referendums to achieve the result, whereas those desiring to remain only need to win one? |
|