|
What? That the UK spent less than other comparable countries between 1980 and 2012?
Try giving some data to show what I said is untrue...
Now perhaps, depending on how you look at the figures. But didn't use to.
As that link states "the UK actually spent above the EU-15 and OECD averages – as a percentage of GDP – in 2014".
Up until 2012 (8.5%) the UK had the lowest spend out of 11 listed countries (G7/G10/G12) as a percentage of GDP except as I mentioned previously a couple of years when New Zealand was lower. In 1991 UK spent 5.5% rising to 8.7% in 2009. Over that same period France was spending 8.2% rising to 10.8%. Decades of chronic underfunding of the NHS hardly surprisingly leads to some worse healthcare metrics vs the higher spending countries.
Look at the interactive chart at Mirror, Mirror 2017: International Comparison Reflects Flaws and Opportunities for Better U.S. Health Care
In 2013 the UK was at 8.5%, lower than the OECD average of 8.9% of GDP. Figure 2
https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Country-Note-SWEDEN-OECD-Health-Statistics-2015.pdf
or the dataset the graphs are based on Health expenditure and financing
By 2017 UK has risen to 9.6%, average estimated OECD was 9%
Health expenditure as a share of GDP, 2016 (or nearest year) | READ online
Health expenditure has grown to a 9.9% share of GDP in 2015, which is at the EU average,
United Kingdom: Country Health Profile 2017 | READ online
We still spend less than countries such as France and Sweden, but a similar amount to Spain and Portugal, and we are not far behind countries such as Austria and Belgium. Measured by health spending per person, however, the UK is a little below average, so that money is being spread more thinly. Source: same link as you gave.
UK is slightly above the EU-14 unweighted average since 2014 9.9% vs 9.7%, but below the EU-14 weighted average 9.9% vs 10.3%. Source: same link as you gave. |
|