|
The whole Batman vs Superman debate goes on a lot, even still...
Personally I see anyone saying Batman can and has beat Superman or anything along them lines, I just read it as one of a few different possible things that they mean...
1) Batman can beat Superman when Superman isn't prepared and Batman is
2) Batman can beat Superman when there are complications (Poison Ivy - Hush, Nuclear Bomb - DKR... for example)
3) I like Batman the best (this is a pretty pointless argument and there's no way to argue against it, so perhaps it's best ignored)
Point 1 is true, everyone knows that and has probably read about it, Point two is pretty much the same, however, it would be pretty ignorant to say Superman will always beat Batman in a fair fight and it would be a reverse of point 3 to argue that way, but I think we can honestly say that in a fair fight Superman will take most of the wins, comfortably.
I don't agree when people say that Batman is the master of planning and has endless ways to beat Superman, we know that he has failed after planning many times, such as Hush, Babel, Dark Knight Returns, Red Son - I could go on... (and will do if you so wish - with details)
The only times that Batman has able to get ahead of Superman are when he has acted unlike his usual self, say holding hostages, usually Superman fights back and wins most fights and to be honest the ones where he doesn't don't really seem to be the best written... make of that what you will.
With regards to the kryptonite dusters - I have not seen Smallville so excuse me for not knowing anything about what you're on about here - but I know Batman has a kryptonite ring that Superman gave him... I'm racking my brains here and can't think of anything else it could be... perhaps it's a spin on that? Or maybe I'm missing the obvious.
Can I just point out I'm more of a Batman fan than Superman, however I have to sadly side with the Superman fans on the argument here, as much as I hate to |
|