|
Maybe I'm being slow, but I don't see the link between this and increased insurance premiums. Are we assuming that the default response of AEB is max braking under any circumstances? What are the conditions that trigger it? Does it moderate / modulate braking if the 'detected hazard' moves? I genuinely don't know as I've never experienced or tested it - so can anyone really quantify the risk of being rear-ended in the event of AEB, do we really believe it to be high risk?
In your squirrel example, you obviously had enough time / distance to identify a hazard, let the situation develop and react accordingly. So no technology intervention required.
Yes, a few - including advanced standard ones. I'm not sure what your point is but again that could be me being slow. Not every braking event is an emergency - but you should be prepared for one being performed by the guy in front of you and leave enough appropriate distance, irrespective of it being an emergency stop, half-brakes stop, or coasting-to-traffic lights stop. Not sure why this aspect is debatable.
Absolutely agreed - which is why there is a demand for such aids that cater for human error and misjudgment.
I don't think I'm actually disagreeing with anyone on here? Whilst a good idea in principle, AEB is an imperfect system designed to cater for humans that can and will make mistakes - and on that basis should not be relied upon to the detriment of basic driving standards. |
|