|
|
This is a transparent effort by Scott's relatives and appeals attorney to "prove" he's innocent by offering only interviews with people who are on his side already. There are interviews with Scott's family, defense attorneys, private investigators, and other legal consultant who were hired by Scott's people. At no point do you get a full picture of the case because this documentary is not concerned with offering both sides. Unlike some documentaries which keep you guessing from moment to moment whether or not the subject is guilty, it's clear from the first 5 minutes of the first episode that the filmmakers are trying to convince you of Scott's innocence. Some of the explanations they set forth for the evidence are ridiculous (like "someone accidentally withdrew $15,000 cash and gave it back to Scott Peterson.")
If the entire claim is the police had tunnel vision toward Scott, this documentary is purely tunnel vision against Scott. It's honestly a waste of time and I feel like I know less about the case than I did when I started.
score 3/10
sarahwesterly 2 September 2019
Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw5094567/ |
|
25-10-2020 11:48:09