|
|
Did his family bankroll this? This is a well made show (very high production value) but it is so biased to Scott Peterson's side it's mind boggling. All evidence against him is presented poorly, partially, or not presented at all. A lot of the "evidence" and stories they do present are often things that has been proven false, but it is presented here as fact. Other statements are riddled with inaccuracies. They spend a lot of time interviewing his family members that support him, but no interviews with his two siblings which have publicly stated they believe he is guilty. I was really interested to see this to see another side to the story, but this is more fiction than a factual counterpoint. If you don't already know the facts of this case, this fantastical "documentary" might sway you to believe Scott Peterson's story, but if, like myself, you know the facts in this case, there is nothing new, this is bafflingly one sided, and it will do nothing but irritate you.
UPDATED to add there is a fantastic point by point rebuttal piece to this documentary on Reddit, with all the facts that are not presented here and links to the information, for anyone not already familiar with the facts.
score 1/10
misshazzard-61763 29 July 2019
Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw5027581/ |
|
25-10-2020 11:48:08