Shows how good your research and argument is if you can't even check to see word "probably" doesn't appear in my post at all 
Much like you reading Antifa or BLM involvment into stories and images that don't contain anything of the sort.
Oh no, you said"most likely", if you wish to be pedantic. A better synonym for "probably" would be hard to come up with.
Yep, never believe an image, and certainly not a meme.
Just google searching Marv's posted images the other day led me straight to this BuzzFeed story from May ...
Fake Antifa Twitter Accounts Are Trolling People And Spreading Misinformation
Why would you bother?
They do such a marvellous job of discrediting themselves.......
Weren't you defending the validity of the images earlier ?Have most of them been discredited or not?
Well not by using the Toko B "I reckon" criteria.
I'm saying that antifa do a fine job of discrediting themselves.
Will you not even concede he "might" be right that at least some of those images have nothing to do with antifa activity?
Of course he "might" be. He just hasn't provided any proof beyond saying they are "most likely" nothing to do with antifa. That's opinion, not fact.
Doing Gods work lad.For a hearty chuckle check out the EU country ball.
Exhibit "A"
Now, do you have better evidence that this was Antifa related?
If not, it seems clear you are simply mud slinging at another member rather than making a credible point.