I cannot find the word 'censor' in this thread, except in your post.
So if you are not suggesting that the Mail be somehow censored why are you supporting this stunt by Stop Funding Hate? - what do you think they are trying to do if not censor the mail?
this is not HNH
The Guardian is the opposing view to the Mail, both have their place as political voices, one supports social citizenship and the other supports active citizenship, using words like bigot, racist etc just cloud the issues.
Politics is naturally pluralistic so no one view or opinion is correct. Although personally this new emperors clothing of 'Identity and victim' culture of the left is taking the natural paternal leanings of socialist thought and debasing the arguments somewhat.
Paper-chase are a private business, being so means they can advertise and should be free to market their products with whom ever they want, they certainly shouldn't be subjected to coercion for using a mainstream paper. This is not Russia, where the walls have ears, opposing views are not sanctioned or people sent to death camps for non compliant thinking, it's relatively free and democratic country.
corrected
I think Paperchase are the ones most likely to lose out over this, I doubt that many of the nose ring wearers in Stop Funding Hate could afford to shop there.
I don't support them, nor do I censor them.
If you are happy with the Daily Mail's quality of output then I have no issues with that either.
Nothing to do with whether I am happy or not - as the biggest selling newspaper in the UK they obviously have plenty of people happy with the content.
that's The Sun
Ah lovely the friendly face of the alt left. Nothing like some good militant behaviour justified by their self belief of higher morality. They are so full of bullsh*t.
But let’s be very real. Paperchase get more exposure from this than advertising could buy, as does this campaign group, and even the daily mail.
Call me an old cynic but no party involved acts with integrity.