Is there any evidence to suggest he isn't neutral? As far as I can see he has allowed the May deal to be debated twice. Brexiteers and remainers alike have praised his actions.
If both sides hate you, you're probably doing something right.
Both Leave and Remain thought his intervention helped their causes.That's impressive in such divided times.
He has had a few nice stickers on his car. If he was truly neutral then he should take it home as well.
On many occasions he has not been neutral, and makes no secret of his opinions. (remember his long speech about Trump addressing the house?)
But on this occasion I believe he is right.
The second time it was put to vote there had been some new information from the EU and, of course Geoffrey Cox. But this time, what has changed?
Just saying it might pass this time because pressure has been put on MPs is not quite the same as a change in the WA itself.
And this couldn't have been posted in one of the existing Brexit threads 
Was his explanation not good enough for you?
I usually ignore the Guardian in the same way I ignore the right wing red tops and broad sheets.
The Guardian have been whipping up their cause, this is just some more whipping.
No he doesn't.
The one that AVF closed down?
Cheers,
Nigel
What's the correlation between employment rate and economic growth?For another period showing an increase in employment/reduction in unemployment, the UK economy (GDP) has dropped by 0.4%.
United Kingdom GDP Growth Rate | 2019 | Data | Chart | Calendar | Forecast
Does this suggest that more people are being employed but are less productive (e.g. someone working such a small number of hours so as to have limited impact on productivity but still 'employed') ?