|
At some point in the distant past evolution branched off into plant and animal life. Genetic Modification merely speeds up the process of evolution and it's not always the case of a gene from an animal being inserted into a plant. Plant to Plant Gene swapping goes on. Depends on what you are attempting to do. Surprised you've not freaked out over scientists creating synthetic bacteria in the lab http://gizmodo.com/mad-scientists-created-synthetic-bacteria-with-only-473-1766686722
Greenpeace is not what it once was. If Nuclear Fusion is ever cracked, you can bet Greenpeace will attempt to stop it from being used merely because it's Nuclear energy.
That's a fairly obvious statement to make. Just about everything we eat today has been selectively bred with traits to either increase crop yields, disease resistance or to change the taste to make it more palatable. You will have eaten GM food without knowing it, but that's down to the food supply chain.
Everything on this planet is either toxic or radioactive. You have to balance the benefits and the risks to make a sound judgement. What you don't seem to get that is with our current population and expected increases globally, we simply do not have the means to produce enough food to keep everyone adequately fed going forwards. Let alone meeting energy needs.
Genetic Modification does have risks, but they have been overblown. Leading to unfounded fears being used to halt scientific progress. Which ironically is the only way to know what the risks actually are. As for history repeating itself ? If we don't use all of our technological developments to adapt and mitigate the consequences of climate change ? As has happened in the past, the demand for resources will outstrip the supply and civilisation collapses. |
|