|
I must admit, I was surprised at Armstrongs withdrawal to fight the charges. Let's be honest here, we have one of the biggest sporting icons in the world who has faced down cancer to go on and win 7 tours and who has built an amazingly successful charity on the back of his astonishing determination and ability to overcome the odds. That can never be taken away from him regardless of the outcome.
His whole image has been about not giving in, so for him to make this decision regardless of how long it has been going on does smack of guilt. I would have expected him to fight until the ends of the earth to clear his name.
We're not talking Dwain Chambers here, this is a man who has tasted unparalleled success and enjoys almost god like status in cycling on which everything since has been built. His name, his charity and his legend. If as he constantly maintains he is innocent and the victim of a witch hunt then you do not throw everything you have achieved away no matter the burden on your private life. You fight tooth and nail to clear your name - unless you are guilty.
Also because of the repurcussions this will have on the sport, I don't think the governing body of cycling would pursue someone of the status of Lance Armstrong so vigorously if they weren't completely certain they had overwhelming evidence to support their decision.
Very odd and completely at odds with everything LA as a person has stood for thus far.
As an aside though, I do agree that there is absolutely no point in drug testing if the results on the athletes then have absolutely no bearing on any given case instigated by the authorities |
|