|
got to be honest here @thesnowdog i am seeing some double standards mate. when htc released the vive pro you were dissapointed at how poor the improvement was and suggested oculus would never be so daft as to release a rift 1.5... and it seems that is exactly what they have done :/
@Atmos you say you are dissapointed and not gloating... the fact your posted like 10 (a guess) posts in short shift rather than 1, each one with your perceived downside certainly looks more like gloating than an attempt at genuine discourse.
My view....... dissapointed to be honest.
it is not all bad, its cheap, all accounts say the tracking is great, and who am i to argue having not tried it and will mean usb issues for some will be a thing of the past. having a full RGB display is great and i am convince with the new lenses visuals are going to be a big step up over all.
but the reduction to 80hz, LED instead of OLED and 1 screen instead of 2 and no IPD adjustment? (1 screen instead of 2 means wasted pixels in all likelyhood and i would bet money in a reduction in FOV, and that my friends will be the killer for me if it is the case.
over all i think it sounds 2 steps forward, 1 step back. hardly what i was hoping for after over 3 years.
Am not saying i will never buy one, if my rift fails i may still do but i aint going to be rushing out to get one that is for sure, and if valve can bring something decent to the table with knuckles ii can see me jumping ship.
I find it hard to believe anyone who thought the vivepro was a misstep can honestly be excited by the rift S if they are being honest with themselves imo. |
|