|
Do you understand split level though? Do you realise the significance and how it works? Naming convention of folders/files, and a combination of split level and another setting (I forget the name) which defines how each disk is filled up, can massively influence how well it works for you. A lot of people will want to be able to watch TV episodes/series or browse pictures or other media without an additional disk spinning up. Each user share can be tailored to meet your expected usage. Storing video files inside their own folder is usually advantageous from what I have seen and allows for much more flexibility regarding split level.
Because you might want to override where unraid deems it fit to distribute your files. Some people might use unraid server not just as media storage, but as a file server for documents and other backups of files/software. You might for example, want to store software which contains several subfolders of which you would want to ensure all reside on the same disk, so as when called upon, only one disk spins up to serve what you want. Not to mention that distributing something like software files accross multiple disks will introduce the latency of each additional disk that needs to be span up during say an install.
I'm just saying, these are the kinds of things that are holding me back as I keep trying to plan for my usage. Perhaps I am over analyzing somewhat.
For people that do not care for powersaving and have all disks spun up all the time they may not notice these things.
I'm not thinking about it from that angle. More that I do not want people to be browsing shares that have modify access incase of accidental deletion of content. I am wondering how people manage this. i.e. Say I want to be able to write to/modify the share, then I would look to setup a password for this to be allowed. For all media shares I would allow read access to anybody, so clients that are just media players should have no issues.
Yes. I do quite agree. Most uses of unraid should only really require very basic read requirements. However, I would personally be looking for as high a read/write performance as possible since I plan to use it as a general file server as well. I gather than NFS shares are best for performance, but I am not sure if they can be a pain to setup with stability. I probably will run a cache drive and I may explore an Intel NIC. The onboard realtek NICs have been blamed before for being a large bottleneck.
Hugo, how long have you had your setup? Any extra info on your uses, hardware, setup most welcome. |
|