|
Some additions to the DAC FAQ about using a DVD Video as a transport. First off the general AV user will approach the addition of a DAC as a sympton of poor hifi playback from either his DVD player or the level of stereo perfromance from his AV amp, theis following advice is from some other discussions I have had about DACs on another forum :
Transports are the proverbial black hole in DAC circles, I can see why many people subscibe to the 1 & 0s pheory but there is no doubt that transport connection type & quality of DAC can induce unwanted effects into the DAC chain, Jitter is oft held as the bain of DAC usage but many will agree I think that they have heard very low jittered CD playback systems that sound harsh & veiled.
My personal preference of transport has always been DVD Video based this is for a number of reasons :
Quite a few (Pioneer, Denon, Sony ES) are capable of pure 24/96 PCM output this to my mind (IMHO) is a superior digtal output than one tied to 16/44.1 PCM, there is a belief held by some people I have spoken to in the past the higher the pcm data sent the lesser jitter effect on the signal. But the fact it can go that extra hurdle (if required) makes it superior IMHO, of course this is when fed a 24/96 PCM DAD DVD Video disc but it is the current highest stereo data stream allowed digitally on the market. Some makers like Perpetual Technologies have cottoned onto this fact and produce a product called a P1-A correllation engine which takes a 16/44.1 pcm input then upsample to 24/96 then output at 24/96 into their DACs, so like a buffer stage that reduces jitter and passes on a less jittered 24/96 signal to their 24/96 capable DAC.
Every DVD player in the land can output a 48Khz signal which again is a higher one than CDs output, so the joys of 48Khz DVD Video are within grasp to everyone. Even 5.1 mixes downmixed into stereo sound astounding IME.
As above you are not just tied to redbook CD for your listening material, many DVD Video now come with 16/48 PCM stereo tracks which a DVD Video will pass forward in the output from the machine.
Things get even better if you consider using a SACD/DVD Audio/DVD Video players as DAC Transports IMO as you open up those format types as viable stereo material for example :
Even though they are predominantly MC music formats SACD includes a discrete stereo mix on all SACD mixes & DVD Audio offers some 24/192 PCM stereo tracks, these can be sampled via the player into your amp, all that is needed is another set of ICs. So you will run am digital feed into a DAC then analogue output from the F&L Front MC outputs, here is a description :
SACD & DVD Audio can be enjoyed in stereo form even without a 5.1 surround amp, so using a MC SACD/DVD Audio device is in your stereo setup is not as daft an idea , all it requires is a set of IC from the L&R Front MC RCA outputs on the player, so the ICs you run for 5.1 F&L SACD will output 24/192 PCM stereo track on DVD Audio as well. What you gain is higher resolution processing from these formats processed onboard, on the back of most universal players is generally 5.1 analogue outputs, these are for Front Left & Right (Stereo), Centre, Rear Left & Right & a sub channel. So if you run a standard set of ICs from the F L&R RCA outputs, you can then gain the benefits of SACD & DVD Audio from the transport & oboard processors , then add an offboard DAC for current redbook replay via the coaxial output and you have all bases covered for the future.
MC players but perfectly usable in a stereo system I think you will agree
As for out & out quality in sound terms : I totally agree with dudes who say the best CD transport types to use for sound quality are dedicated CD Transports with Balanced XLR output, Masterclock synch linked cables (ie an extra cable purely for synching materclocks on the DAC Trans), AT&T. Glass optical etc. etc. But IMO I like the ability to have the flexibility in material type I can use from my transport and as long as you get a good one with half decent jitter output, just look at a DAC that is quite resilliant to jitter (true recovery reclockers like MFs) from varying transports, a lot of transport woes IME can be addressed by the DAC before the transport itself proves detrimental.
I hope that in my views above it appears that I believe that transport quality is apparent and that it can make a difference hence my view on the connection types, but all kit is different from DACs to Transports to Electrical Supply quality it goes on and on. Im also a firm believer in the delineation of some kit in price terms in that I have found a £500 DVD player fitted with a £300 DAC can outperform the same DAC in a £800 CDP (To my ears of course). I happen to think most DVD players with a keen eye on low jitter can be used effectively as transports as long as they feed a DAC that has a recovery clocking design in its makeup, this again for DAC around the £1000 mark is a must, this level of kit is an indicator of what can be achieved lower down the ladder IMHO, I have no argument at all that dedicated CD Transports are better than DVD video players as transports but I would say that DVD players in this sector ie sub £1000 DAC are more than acceptable, but they are not the only fruit as it were, A lot of what a DAC gets right straight away is the separation of noisy circuitry & individual power supply rather than sharing within the busy confines of a transport box.
If I had a £2000 DAC sitting on my rack would I be content knowing it was being fed by a DVD player : Not a chance but Im happy with the level of transport quality I have at present. But everyones kit and "level of acceptance" is different (nothing wrong with that BTW) I personally feel for me that good results can be had (well as good as my ears can appreicate with a mid level DVD player doing the signal sending) with the quality of kit I have at present.
Feel the force of the DAC side !! |
|