|
Retro Beekeeper
Jeez dudes a real hifi thread, marvellous !! I share a lot of your views dudes about transport quality and I know that at the higfher end of the spectrum when using a DAC that can be run off a transport with superior connections such as the DAC 20s ie its 110 XLR input then that is the way to go, but I think in the middle regions of the hifi world (Ie in sub £1000 CDPs) there are very acceptable transports available that can be fed into good quality DACs like the TAG DAC 20, A DAC that has had great attention paid to recovery clocking and the like (this makes transport less critical IMHO), For example the Pioneer 646A had very low jitter traces in one recent review with a Paul Miller lab report Ive seen, the old Sony QS range of FPM puck CDPs 930 & 940 had very small amounts of jitter, does this make then acceptable as transports ? FWIW the best design Ive seen recently for a design of CDP that has had lots of attention for active jitter supression from the digital output, is the £1000 Creek CD53 :
http://www.creekaudio.co.uk/products/cd53.asp
With a new customised ultra low jitter master clock and extra circuitry to reduce jitter from the Digital signal Processor, the CD53 truly sings. A re-clocked, low jitter, transformer coupled, co-axial and optical digital output makes it possible to fully realise the potential of high-end stand alone DAC, provided the correct type of interconnect is used.
To provide a useful upgrade path, the D to A converter, high quality master clock generator, jitter reduction circuitry and regulated power supplies are sited on a separate printed circuit board that can be removed and replaced by new or emerging technologies in the future.
I call that good design for an Int. CD player with a view to using it as a transport does the CD72T follow this level of design ? AFAIR the Arcam uses a Sony mechanism and usign a mid priced Sony ES CDP will beat it as a transport, even old models long since replaced.
FWIW Michael I know a lot of dudes who have added that very DAC to a bewlidering amount of transports and all report improvements in their original playback. I added it my system and it is a truly wonderful unit for example Im pretty happy what it can do off a £500 DVD player BTW, Does your DVDR not have an optical output in addition to your coaxial out ? if so run coaxial to DAC, then optical to AV amp for DTS/DD as Retro has said above. If not the TAG DAC may not be for you as Ive heard a dude mentioning that when used in that configuration ie looping a 48Khz signal from the DAC output, made a much leaner sound (the TAG reclocks the info from the DVD player) from his AV amp, best running 2 cables as suggested ie coax DAC & optical AV Amp. BTW I think buying an integrated CDP below £1000 is not up to what you could achieve with adding a £450 DAC.
Ask yourself this dude, you have a transport already are you willing to buy one again in an integrated CDP, this will curtail your sound per pound upgrade in the DAC department. When you can in effect buy a DAC alone the whol cost of the upgrade going on the DAC alone, for example the DAC 20 cost £1200 when new can adding a sub £1000 CDP outshine it ? not IMHO. |
|