|
I agree. It's basic commonsense, really. The average household uses more energy than can be economically extracted from its own ground area (wind, solar and ground heat). I emphasise economically. It doesn't mean, as you say, that individual sites, purpose-built house, or people with enough money, can't do it, but the technology is nowhere near good enough yet to justify retro-fitting the average house, not to mention high-density housing such as blocks of flats.
It's the classic dilemma: given enough take-up it might happen, but the current cost of take-up is prohibitive. You see it with alternative-fuelled cars, too. Perhaps the great progress being made with them is a hopeful sign for domestic energy, too, but it's a much more difficult task. |
|