|
Mass surveillance only gets you so far. I'd imagine the UK is now drowning in data, of possible suspects, of suspicious activity reports. Even with advanced AI to narrow that down, ultimately, somebody has to follow up and investigate. Somebody has to gather hard evidence to justify an arrest and prosecution. Somebody has to be on the streets to intercept and prevent adhoc unplanned, and undetected attacks.
That Theresa May's first instinct is to go after the internet is absurd. Collecting more data, more intelligence isn't going to stop attacks.
Since 2000, there have been many anti-terrorism laws.
Terrorism Act 2000
Anti-terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001
Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005
Terrorism Act 2006
Counter-Terrorism Act 2008
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011
Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015
Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014
Investigatory Powers Act 2016
There have also been about 100 statutory instruments since 2000 with "Terrorism" in title alone:
Contained in this legislation are some of the widest, most general provisions in the history of criminal and also surveillance law.
It is difficult to imagine what more laws about terrorism there could be.
Since 2000, the UK has averaged a new terrorism statue every two years.
So many terrorism statutes since 2000 government has run out of names for them: Terrorism Act, Anti-Terrorism Act, Counter-Terrorism Act
At this point, it's hard to believe that more laws, or more attacks of citizen liberty will make us safer. |
|