|
It's one of those devicive subjects that stimulates a disproportionate response from one side of the debate than the other.
Firstly as mentioned, the churches influence in the culture and politics of Ireland is stronger than in the mainland UK.
Secondly, both the Catholic and Prodestent church in Ireland/N.I are more conservative than on the mainland UK.
The troubles both polarised the population religiously and in that polarisation, a higher percentage of each denomination place their religion as a definition of who they are than the norm for the rest of the UK.
Thirdly, the idea that life begins at conception, especially if you believe that God creates that life, means that a significant amount of people will have very strong feelings in contrast with those that don't.
On the other side of the debate, the focus is from the perspective of a woman's right to her own body and to choose.
Womens rights engender a lot of support in society nowadays, but not as much and as strongly individually as that of taking someones life.
Ergo, if you do believe that abortion is ending the life of a person that came into being at the point of conception, you tend to feel emotionally far more strongly about it even across gender lines than about womens rights. We are genetically programmed to feel the desire to protect babies and children - the more you believe a zygote or embryo is an actual child(person) at that point in it's development, the more you are likely to feel strong impulses to react negatively towards it's termination.
It's also a much simpler and clearer issue for those that believe in life at conception than those don't, because science doesn't tend to deal with such absolutes.
It's far harder to argue about viability and likelihoods of survival as a position to take on whether or not a termination is immoral or not than if you believe in the absolute.
So in summary, even if in general, more of any age demographic believe in the right to abortions than not, the representative proportion of those people who feel strongly enough and get out to vote (or get out campaigning) is going to be lower than for those that are anti-abortion, this will be even more significantly seen in gender distributions - i.e a greater disparity in male voters.
It may be that case that in a 50/50 split in public opinion, you would find that in terms of votes and campaigns, anti-abortionists would appear to represent 80% of the public.
For it to be a case that the vote appears tied at 50/50, it would probably only require only 20 to 30% of the population to be strongly against abortion as a whole.
It's those with the strongest convictions and loudest voices that tend to dominate the political and social discourse.
Note: I did not express my own personal opinion in my above rant comments.
My own opinion on the subject is that I agree with the right to abortion, especially and absolutely before 12 weeks, or in the case of rape/the health of the mother.
I agree on principle that prior to 21 weeks, a fetus is highly unlikely to be viaible and it should be up to the individuals involved after advice and discussion to make their own choice as to carry on with the pregnancy or not - on the balance of ethical positions on the rights of the individual (mother and child) according to the best information we have available. |
|