|
To intervene or not to intervene?
The Syrian crisis is an example where we did not directly intervene. The West was on the verge of bombing Assad, but thanks to Ed Milliband, the UK backed down and then the US followed.
By doing nothing, (and actually I would have supported Assad but with pressure for change) we have allowed the situation to get completely out of control. ISIS is powerful supported by the Arabs and we now have a new bunch of terrorists (sorry BBC for using a banned word) that want to cause havoc in Europe. Not to mention the numbers killed, and displaced. Refugees are streaming to Europe (and Calais)
Intervention by supporting Assad with the Russians might have nipped this in the bud. |
|