|
Edit
Just after a simple yes or no as everything can be argued both ways. If it's a repair then I will hire an expert witness, if it's a replacement then I know not to
I am currently in dispute with a Ford dealership in Leeds over work done
Advice on Ford dealership questionable repairs?
and i would just like to know how much of an issue this is before i take things further. Apologies for starting another thread, its simply been done so as people in the know can answer the one question without it getting lost on the other thread.
It was evident that at least one of the front to rear brake pipes had been replaced. This had been joined to the frontal central area. The pipes had been sprayed with a black paint substance and as such we were unable to assess their condition. There was no evidence of any further replacement of the front brake pipes
And
We were unable to confirm if the offside rear brake pipe hose had been replaced as this was contaminated with road dirt and debris.
A 100 miles had taken place between the work and the inspection.
So my questions are
1) is joining to the Frontal central area a replacement of brake pipes (i paid for both front and back pipe replacement) or is it a repair, especially as the left parts where sprayed with paint?
2)Granted a 100 miles had taken place in between but surely even covered with dirt it should be obvious if the offside rear brake pipe had been replaced?
But i'm not a mechanic so i might well be wrong on the above. Am I? |
|