|
Right,
I am not sure what value this will serve, but let's go through it from the beginning.
1. I posted an opinion that the British people did not understand the nature of a written consitution. Why? because the posts previously indicated that ignorance... Since British people are not familiar with a written consitution that ignorance is perfectly understandable.. I then provided definitions and facts as to how a written consitution operated. ... Your response was an accusation of plagiarism and bad spelling.
2. You made a supposition that all violence originated from one side... . That of the central government. My response was along the lines of absence of evidence is not evidence of absence and that there are different modes of intimidation. Broadcasters do not find these newsworthy. Your response to that was to suggest I was a member of a tin hat brigade.
3. My citing a family involvement was not an emotional outburst, rather to clarify that violence did continue post poll. Incidentally I am not aware of the instigators whether they were pro independence or otherwise. Police were not involved.
Whether you or I have sympathy for an independent Catalan is not relevent. But the assumption that the illegal referendum was "pointless" is untrue. Their prime minister used it a week later as the basis for independence.
The only point in which we both can agree is that the central government actions of invading polling stations was counterproductive, and an over reaction on the day. |
|