So rather than admitting you were wrong you talk even more nonsense that further undermines any credibility you had. 
I do keep warning you you're wasting your time!!
He claims to have had scientific training.Possibly in astrology or homeopathy.For sure it wasn't physics or maths.
I reckon his scientific 'training' amounts to a 'C' grade in double science at GCSE. 
'eco-marxist'
If people needed more evidence that your ideas and opinions are based upon political and ideological beliefs rather than science, it's using terms like that.
I wouldn't worry too much, I have more than enough credbility with people I respect, so your opinion means nothing.
1.So you have viewed the climategate emails and a) don't see anything wrong with what went on and b) think this perfectly appropriate science?!
Scary.
2.How much money is spent on research to 'prove' man mande global warming.How much on the opposite?Follow the money......
3. So you don't believe that CO2 lags temperature rather than drives temperature?What about the link to the scientific paper I showed?Or don't you have any respect for the peer review process when it doesn't suit your views?

Sidicks
Ah, no evidence to contradict my posts, so resorting to personal attacks?
I think that is common practice from those obsessed with man-made global warming......

FWIW, I have a 1st class Maths degree, 4 A-levels at grade A (Maths, Further Maths, Physics and Chemistry).I also took 12 GCSEs (8A's, 4B's) plus I took a Maths O level at age 14 at passed with an A grade.
For the avoidance of doubt, these were all done pre-1990 before exams got much easier and they introduced the A star grade.
I am also a qualified actuary, which is regarded as one of the most highly respected professions, due to the complexity and effort needed to qualify.

Sidicks
And worrying have demonstrated almost zero comprehension of how science works.  
As for the rest of your rant I have no idea what you are talking about. I entered this thread to pick you up your startlingly poor grasp of scientific methodology.
Where?
What?

//static.avforums.com/styles/avf/smilies/facepalm.gif
Please spell out exactly where you think my scientific knowledge is lacking.

Sidicks